Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_18.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CCGG FASTA(n).Sequence=CCGG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:50
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.52, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  65.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.78, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.76, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  70.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.05, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  84.04, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUCC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.76, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  96.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.96, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.37, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.07, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.15, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  37.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUAU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  82.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  67.57, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.01, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  38.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUAA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -6.01, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  38.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAACU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.26, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.39, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCGUA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.30, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  46.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.38, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.71, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  48.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.38, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  67.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.57, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  83.60, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGAUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.85, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  65.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAGAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.20, deficit  1.68, CutoffScore  55.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F                               
AUGUAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.71, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.67, deficit -0.25, CutoffScore  71.07, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.65, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CAUAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  87.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUAAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.47, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  64.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.27, deficit -0.65, CutoffScore  43.71, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
GAAAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.33, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  66.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.48, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  84.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUAG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.56, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  64.44, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.03, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  88.51, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  67.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.95, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  70.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAGUA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.16, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  26.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUAGU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.14, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore  33.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.58, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  67.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUCGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.80, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  77.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.48, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  82.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGUGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  57.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -9.12, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  36.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.58, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.41, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.00, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore  32.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
UGCGUA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_28791.1,  6 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -3.88, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  47.52, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
GUAGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.87, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  81.36, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGUGCU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.04, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  35.51, ed  4, 2 cWW                                     
GCUGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.03, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  56.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGCCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGUAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.66, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  62.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  5.73, CutoffScore  40.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -15.07, deficit  9.51, CutoffScore  13.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CGUAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  25.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -11.53, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore  41.12, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.96, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  41.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGCAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.91, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  53.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.40, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  79.39, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  71.72, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUGACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.83, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  43.59, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -7.07, deficit -1.02, CutoffScore  55.82, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGACAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
AUUUUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.36, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  79.88, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.03, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  63.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAAAUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.08, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  37.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUAGAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.13, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  35.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -11.59, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  14.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.47, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  30.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.29, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACCACUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore   6.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGACUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUAAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  96.60, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -13.51, deficit 11.56, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAGUUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.43, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  53.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCUCCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGACUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.57, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  30.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACCGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.12, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  29.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  32.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.12, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  60.06, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.74, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  44.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.61, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  42.47, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UUACGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CACAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  33.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.24, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CUGUCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.63, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.43, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  47.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.56, deficit  0.11, CutoffScore  67.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.14, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  29.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  38.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.80, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  51.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  38.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -9.61, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  34.27, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -9.14, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore   7.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.24, deficit  0.84, CutoffScore  27.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAGGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  63.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUUCGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  87.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCCUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.84, deficit -0.18, CutoffScore  74.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CAAAAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -9.21, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  49.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGGGGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.55, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  35.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.64, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  51.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score     -10.51, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore   6.25, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUCUUCAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.54, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  30.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGGAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.28, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  28.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.81, deficit  3.03, CutoffScore  43.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGCGAAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.08, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  40.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAUUGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -11.23, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  15.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  22.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAUUACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.12, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  33.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GGAAUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.58, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  31.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUAAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.53, deficit -0.87, CutoffScore  77.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.92, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  20.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.22, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.01, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore   9.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.13, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  39.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AACCACGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.58, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  45.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  41.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GAAAAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.13, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCGUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.11, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  35.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CGGACAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -9.40, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  26.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUGUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.28, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  53.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CAAACGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.14, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  35.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.68, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCUGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  34.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAACGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.20, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUGGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAACGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore   5.70, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUGUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.42, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
AGCGUUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.57, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  39.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGAAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.86, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  23.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.93, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUGAGAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.84, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  80.82, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  38.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCACGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.59, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore  15.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CUUUCGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.40, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  38.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.81, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore   9.03, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAUUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.81, CutoffScore  14.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUCCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGAUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -12.45, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore  12.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCGUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.69, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  46.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CCUGUGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.19, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  28.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGCACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -13.69, deficit  8.61, CutoffScore  17.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCUUGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -10.74, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  34.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGGAAGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.25, deficit -0.50, CutoffScore  46.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGGUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.29, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  19.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  33.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UCAGGCAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.95, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  10.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAGCAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.76, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  21.58, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAUCGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.62, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  43.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUUACUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.38, deficit  0.47, CutoffScore  26.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
GGGGGGUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore  38.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGCAAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.50, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  32.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAACUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.48, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  34.15, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAACCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.92, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore  10.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAUGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.07, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  35.29, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAACAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.51, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  21.35, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAUAUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -7.97, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  64.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UUAGCGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.98, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  21.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAACGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.11, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  34.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.25, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore  48.89, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCUUCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.77, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  39.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUCUUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CAACUUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.55, CutoffScore  11.32, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAACCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.88, deficit  7.59, CutoffScore   0.16, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.19, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  27.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCCUGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.78, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  62.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GAGGAAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.57, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  31.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGGCCAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score     -11.32, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  27.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.45, CutoffScore   5.66, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CUUUUGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  23.71, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACCUUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.09, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  25.70, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAGAAACGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.39, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  30.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUCCGUAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.49, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  33.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAACACUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.44, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  16.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUUUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.77, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  19.53, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUAAACUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.22, deficit  3.79, CutoffScore  48.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CAGAUUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -8.65, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  54.73, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.68, deficit  2.84, CutoffScore  31.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAGAGUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.85, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  40.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGGAACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -12.32, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore   5.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UAGAUCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore  12.80, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUGAAAAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -6.01, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  72.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
UGAUAAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.46, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  41.17, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCAGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.36, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  33.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AAGGGCAUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -10.30, deficit  1.58, CutoffScore  34.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCCUAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.85, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  42.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UGAAAAUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.50, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  12.39, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AGUUCUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -8.74, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  34.23, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUUGAAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.59, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  47.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GUUAUAUGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCGCGUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.67, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  24.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGUAAAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -8.30, deficit -0.02, CutoffScore  60.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAACGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -13.73, deficit  5.15, CutoffScore   0.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UACCUUAUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score      -8.81, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  35.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
ACAGAGACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.23, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  44.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGGCGAUCUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -7.74, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  61.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUUGAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -11.57, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  50.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAACAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.59, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCUGUGGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -8.70, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  56.47, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGGAAGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.17, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  29.79, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUAUCGUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.75, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore   2.12, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGAGAAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCACAUCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.77, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore   4.79, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUAUUUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -11.14, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore   7.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAGAGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.62, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  17.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGUACGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.73, deficit  6.10, CutoffScore   9.23, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGUUUGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.99, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  44.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUCGUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.04, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore  21.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUAAGUAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.98, deficit  6.35, CutoffScore  23.02, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCGGAAACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.23, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  26.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGGAGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -9.08, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  21.07, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGUGCACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -13.24, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore   3.78, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UACGGAAAUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.12, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore  28.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUACAGACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -12.77, deficit  6.25, CutoffScore   6.59, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CGAAAGGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.62, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  30.43, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAGGCCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.14, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  11.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.22, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  33.52, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACAACAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  17.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGAACACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -10.26, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  14.34, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
UACAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.29, deficit  4.37, CutoffScore  26.60, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
UUGGUGAUUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.95, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  23.74, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGAAAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.55, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  51.10, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGACUUUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.58, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  14.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGUUAAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.47, deficit  4.16, CutoffScore  32.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GACAAAUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.89, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore   7.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CAGUGCAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -10.31, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore  14.08, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CGAUUGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.44, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  58.17, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAAAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCCCGAUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.83, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  22.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAUUGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.44, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  58.17, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGUUUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.35, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  25.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAUCACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -11.55, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore  20.87, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACUGAGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.83, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore   4.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUGUAAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.77, deficit  4.44, CutoffScore  31.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAAUGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.92, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  25.96, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUUACCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -8.65, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  73.76, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGACCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -15.09, deficit  9.75, CutoffScore   4.82, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAUAUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.81, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGAAAUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.70, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore   5.42, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUGUAAAUGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  15.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAGGAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -16.40, deficit 11.33, CutoffScore   1.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGAUGAAUUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.06, deficit  4.75, CutoffScore   8.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGGAUGGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -15.31, deficit  8.83, CutoffScore   8.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GAGCAAAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.11, deficit  3.79, CutoffScore  14.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAGAACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.11, deficit  8.77, CutoffScore  11.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CUCAGAUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.40, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore  17.84, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGUUUGUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.04, deficit  6.23, CutoffScore  11.02, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUGUGAGGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.87, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  11.16, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUGGAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.77, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  41.83, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CACUCAAUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.27, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  33.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAAUAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUCCAUAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score      -8.46, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  59.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CACAAUCGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAUCCCUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   0.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.15, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore   1.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CUUUUGAUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.00, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  23.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUUUUUAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -11.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  48.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCCCCAUGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93616.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -13.10, deficit  7.22, CutoffScore   3.92, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGGAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.83, deficit  9.75, CutoffScore   5.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAGCCGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.40, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  13.55, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUCAGACUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   7.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGUAAAAAUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.09, deficit  1.48, CutoffScore  15.49, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAAAACAAAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.32, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  23.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUGAAAACCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.44, deficit  0.83, CutoffScore  19.56, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGGCGGUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -10.47, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  34.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCGUGAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.99, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore   8.55, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAUGUAGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.79, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  18.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUGAUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.73, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore  16.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUUUUCUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.67, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.87, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGAGAUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.04, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  68.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAUCAGUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.94, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore  43.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CCGAGUGUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.33, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGUUUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.20, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  35.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CUCAAGAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -14.59, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore   8.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAUAAUCACAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.51, deficit  5.74, CutoffScore  18.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCUCCGGGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -11.58, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  34.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUACCAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.51, deficit  5.50, CutoffScore  19.91, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGAAGCGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.36, deficit  6.88, CutoffScore  18.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CUUUGAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.78, deficit  6.96, CutoffScore  11.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAUUUUUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.18, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  39.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUAACGCCAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -14.74, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  20.88, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUCGAAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.07, deficit  4.46, CutoffScore  15.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGACGGAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50851.1,  9 NTs,          GAGGCGGUUGGU,score     -11.13, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore  29.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F                   
GGCACAAAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.99, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAAAACAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.23, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  33.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUCGGAAUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.68, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  16.07, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCGAAUUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.83, deficit  7.06, CutoffScore  11.90, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCAGUUUUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.45, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore   3.01, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUUAAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.18, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  40.01, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACAGGUUCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -11.80, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  43.04, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
UCAAAUAGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.40, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  11.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUUCGAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.47, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  25.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAUGUUUUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.94, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  22.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAGCUGUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -14.17, deficit  6.93, CutoffScore  15.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUUUUAAAUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.28, deficit  1.66, CutoffScore  33.13, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAGUGCACGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.98, deficit  7.36, CutoffScore  18.21, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUCUAUCAUUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.62, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  12.15, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUAAACAAAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.33, deficit 10.26, CutoffScore   0.69, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAUCGCUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -17.57, deficit  9.27, CutoffScore   3.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
GUCCCGACUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -20.47, deficit 12.40, CutoffScore   5.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUGAAUGGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -16.04, deficit  7.89, CutoffScore   7.71, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAGACCCUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.24, deficit  7.47, CutoffScore   9.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAUAAAGGAUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.57, deficit  9.49, CutoffScore   6.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGGUGUUAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.53, deficit  5.76, CutoffScore  19.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAAUCACAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.36, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore   5.60, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAUGUAUAGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.27, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore   2.33, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AACGAAGACACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.72, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAGAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.88, deficit  7.81, CutoffScore  28.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGACAGUCAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.79, deficit  8.06, CutoffScore  14.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUUGGGAAGUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.99, deficit  6.22, CutoffScore   4.75, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGGUCGUAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.31, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore   5.66, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGAUUGCCCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.96, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore  12.79, ed  4, 4 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAGGGUGAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -11.62, deficit  4.89, CutoffScore  15.57, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUCGAGGGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -11.86, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   9.67, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
AGAUUCGGGAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.23, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  42.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CGAGAGUGUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.98, deficit  4.73, CutoffScore  16.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CAGGCGAUGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.99, deficit  5.36, CutoffScore   9.96, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUGAAUAUUCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.84, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore   9.14, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGUCGCAGAUGUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.02, deficit  6.62, CutoffScore   3.61, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAUCCAGAGCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02581.1, 11 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -17.01, deficit  7.48, CutoffScore   2.83, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F                   
CUCUUGUAGUAUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07903.1, 13 NTs,       GUAUUGCAGUACCUC,score     -15.25, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore   9.61, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
AGGAUCAAGUACAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_64292.1, 10 NTs,      GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU,score     -19.27, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   4.87, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	 16.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 86.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 52.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 24.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 86.0000	 64.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 92.0000	 48.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 88.0000	 44.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 46.0000	 16.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 28.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  65 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence 113 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 158 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 167 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 290 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 317 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 318 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 359 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 376 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 409 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 428 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 482 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 514 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 522 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 525 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 536 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 559 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 625 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 632 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 645 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 658 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 689 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 720 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 744 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 799 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 836 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 857 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 893 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 923 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 943 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 1064 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 1066 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 1101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 1113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 1153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1317 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1575 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1584 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1766 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1780 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1929 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1951 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 2117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 2165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 1.8419%
Number of models giving false positives is 239 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.38
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.79
